Guid: 8D94681A5D7BE02BD91ECCEDA156B3AC
Client-ID: 336148

_________________
.

Hm, that demo is very short and isn't convincing at all.

Kampfschlampe, do you have another demo (a longer one maybe)?

_________________
ssh natirips@*.255.255.255 sudo chown -R natirips / \; echo Also, »QUESTION EVERYTHING«

Demo is too short and there was nothing strange for me.

Need a longer demo or otherwise i will unban him tomorrow morning.

_________________

8:40

_________________
.

Yes in 8:40 you can see the blue model legs... is this hack? loool

Thanks for this demo, now all can see that I'm not WH.

Sry Kampfschlampe, but it looks very clear to me.

Though I was like "What the...?" when the team switching occured.

_________________
ssh natirips@*.255.255.255 sudo chown -R natirips / \; echo Also, »QUESTION EVERYTHING«

First demo: Look for 7:41 - 7:39. Aiming on the tank, a few ms he is going for the doorframe. He cant see any enemy (no sounds/no lights). But then stops (no enemy!), after that the enemy appears.

Second demo 8:42 - 8:40, looking through the wall, waiting, "correcting" his aiming to the alley and after that the enemies appears.

_________________
.

I'm too lazy to re-watch as I don't recall any even slightly suspicious moments.

Ever heard of prediction based on experience and pre-fire?

There was a time when I suspected 90% of people for using wallhacks; now I sometimes do the same that they did.

Some hints: when accusing someone of wallhack, you need to make long demos. Sometimes you must make a few demos over a few rounds. Look for patterns (like constant tracing through walls (visible using /r_shownormals 1 when watching demo), constant extreme "reflexes" that do not make the player tired, attempts at firing through objects you can't normally see through).

But just one suspicious moment means nothing whatsoever.

_________________
ssh natirips@*.255.255.255 sudo chown -R natirips / \; echo Also, »QUESTION EVERYTHING«