[Banned for 30 days] Console strange

[Zottel]

demo

[natirips]

I very much think she's walling.

P.S.: I think it's her: xlr_stats.php?func=player&playerid=357137

[Pirat]

B3 ID: @411401

I vote low fov aimbot. Acknowledgments or
objections welcome.

If no-one objects until 2013-03-09 21:00+0200, I'm
gonna ban him/her for 30 days.

[Pirat]

I very much think she's walling.

P.S.: I think it's her: xlr_stats.php?func=player&playerid=357137

Timestamps? Didn't watch everything with r_shownormals,
but I don't think he/she's walling, just botting.

How do you know it's a "she"?

[TheAdi]

obvious wh and low fov aimbot.
well that's what I see

[natirips]

Well he/she represents himself/herself with a female in-game character (concluded from "ouch"es), so I assume the player is a female as I lack a better source.

@9:55 I looks like a bot would aim better.

Other than that, wallhack is pretty much obvious to me all the time (doesn't track people with the crosshair on them but clearly aims at where they are about to appear).

Edit: the timestamps:
against wallhack: 11:40 10:18

possibly suspicious: 10:10

suspicious: 11:13, 10:32, 10:25,
9:40 doesn't check left but stays on target as seen on the right
9:30 same place but stays on target left
9:10, 8:54, 8:50,
8:38 cute pre-aim skill
8:30 tracking through wall (I admit once or twice now and then could be a coincidence)
7:35 either good skill or wh-ish pre-aim
6:54 wow, nice reflex (although this last one could be subjective because I personally lack good reflexes)

[Pirat]

Thanks, Zottel, pollomaligno, and Natirips!

Extra thanks to Natirips for annotated timestamps!

The situations are suspicious enough for a wallhack
verdict. ==> Banned for 30 days for low fov aimbot
and wallhack.

[Pirat]

Well he/she represents himself/herself with a female in-game character (concluded from "ouch"es), so I assume the player is a female as I lack a better source.

Good thing you have a better source for Cookie. :-]

[natirips]

And for many others.

[JRandomNoob]

*giggles*