[BANNED FOR 30 DAYS] ?Sexy_Girl<# banned [wallhack bitch]

[Crusher]

?Sexy_Girl<# banned cause wallhack bitch

XLR ID: 310190
B3 ID: 356378

Ban Added: 2012-04-05 00:48:42
TempBan Expires: 2012-04-08 00:48:42

Duration: 3 days
Penalty ID: 1610042

[Crusher]

.

[Pirat]

?Sexy_Girl<# banned cause wallhack bitch

XLR ID: 310190
B3 ID: 356378

Ban Added: 2012-04-05 00:48:42
TempBan Expires: 2012-04-08 00:48:42

Duration: 3 days
Penalty ID: 1610042

Obvious wallhack, indeed. But did no-one notice the
snapping? Or am I paranoid? Or is it too late in the
night?

I vote for an additional aimbot with (not terribly)
soft snapping or being activated on a button or
with a limited autoaim-angle.

Other opinions?

[Crusher]

I also tough about a possible aimbot, but the wh itself is more evident...

[Pirat]

I also tough about a possible aimbot, but the wh itself is more evident...

I turned our beliefs into facts when writing the ban
reason "wallhack + aimbot". :-) Banned for 30 days.

Thanks for the demo, Crusher!